Marianne Williamson

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 29

The statement by @laurakrome ('We used to say “I don’t agree with you.” Now people say that if you don’t agree with me, “you’re not getting it right.” Hilarious but also a little bit scary.') constitutes public discourse as it engages with the broader issue of how public disagreements are framed and perceived in contemporary society. The tone is somewhat lighthearted but also carries a critical undertone about the nature of public debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a general observation about societal behavior rather than a direct attack on any individual or group. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a shift in how disagreements are perceived, which can foster empathy and compassion by encouraging people to reflect on their own behavior in public discourse. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of a societal trend without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing a relevant issue in public discourse with integrity. [+1]