Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement and the accompanying images constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about the practices and implications of 'open-washing' in the context of generative AI and open-source models. The conversation critiques how certain AI models and companies may misuse the term 'open source' to gain benefits without adhering to the principles of transparency and contribution to the commons.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and images strive to do no harm by highlighting the potential negative impacts of 'open-washing' on innovation, research, and public understanding of AI. This aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The discussion respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the practices and policies of organizations rather than attacking individuals. This aligns with the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by explaining the consequences of 'open-washing' and advocating for genuine open-source practices. This aligns with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by providing a detailed analysis of the issues with 'open-washing' and suggesting the need for more transparency and accountability. This aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The conversation uses its influence to advocate for better practices in the AI community, aiming for the betterment of society by encouraging genuine open-source contributions. This aligns with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+2]