In reply to:
ᴮⁱᵗˢᴼᶠᵂᵒʳᵈˢ, ᴾʰᴰ
@bitsofwords
·
531d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
532d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a public conversation about a public figure and addresses the nature of the comments made by another user. The tone is defensive and accusatory, aiming to refute the previous comment's characterization.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it accuses the other user of being manipulative and making dark and ugly comments, which could be seen as harmful. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the other user; it labels their comment as manipulative and ugly, which could be considered a form of harassment. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and defensive. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks by calling the comment manipulative and ugly. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.