Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
Alex Howard
@digiphile
·
629d
It seems clear @sama @keshavchan (note a joke on 5/13) & @OpenAI owe Scarlett Johansson an apology, based on @BobbyAllyn’s reporting: https://www.npr.org/2024/05/20/1…
In 2024, a global movie star was still able to get a US AI company not to use her voice. Unusual leverage, & result.
6/2/2024, 8:13:55 PM
X
In reply to:
Nektarios Kalogridis
@NektariosAI
·
616d
@GaryMarcus It's NOT her voice. Period.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
616d
So cute the way Sam looks to the heavens when he lies. 🤦‍♂️
Michael Mindrum, MD
@MichaelMindrum
·
617d
What I hear is someone that has a hard time with the truth.

The statement and the surrounding conversation constitute public discourse as they engage with issues related to AI ethics, intellectual property, and the rights of individuals in the context of AI-generated content. The discussion involves multiple parties and addresses the controversy over the use of a voice that allegedly resembles that of a well-known actress without her consent.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and the conversation do not appear to cause direct harm but do involve accusations and criticisms that could potentially harm reputations if not handled carefully. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation respects the privacy and dignity of the actress by discussing the issue in a public forum without resorting to personal attacks or harassment. However, the initial use of a voice resembling hers without consent could be seen as a violation of her privacy and dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the concerns of the actress and the ethical implications of using AI-generated content that resembles real individuals without their consent. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue involves constructive criticism and does not engage in personal attacks. The participants discuss the issue and its implications rather than attacking individuals personally. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The conversation uses the platform to address significant societal issues related to AI ethics and the protection of individual rights, contributing to the betterment of society by raising awareness and prompting discussions on these topics. [+2]