The statement 'enRAGEment is engagement' and the surrounding conversation involve a discussion on the nature of public discourse, particularly how anger and allegations are used to build allegiance and engagement. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses societal issues related to media, public perception, and the behavior of public figures.
- The statement 'enRAGEment is engagement' does not directly cause harm, but it does suggest that anger is a tool for engagement, which can indirectly promote harmful discourse. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does indirectly endorse a form of engagement that can lead to such behaviors. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it suggests that anger is a valid form of engagement, which can undermine these values. This is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It simplifies the nature of engagement to anger, which can lead to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. This is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement touches on the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly to promote a healthier form of discourse. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.