Paula Smith
@PaulaJSmith2001
·
156d
The statement engages in a discussion about public health measures and the public's perception of them, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive of those who believe in unsubstantiated cures for COVID-19, and it addresses the broader societal issue of misinformation during the pandemic.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of those who hold different views, which might indirectly contribute to polarization. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does show a lack of respect for differing opinions, which could be seen as a minor violation of respecting the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards those who believe in unsubstantiated cures, which is a significant violation of this principle. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and instead dismisses the opposing viewpoint, which is a significant violation of this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly to foster constructive dialogue, which is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.