Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement addresses a public issue, specifically the actions of certain Democratic representatives in relation to sanctions on the International Criminal Court and the protection of a foreign leader from arrest. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting a political stance and calling out specific individuals for their actions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to a polarized and hostile political environment. It does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does name specific individuals, which could be seen as a violation of their privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a critical and accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It focuses on personal attacks by naming specific representatives and accusing them of protecting a foreign leader from arrest for war crimes. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to bring attention to a public issue, but it does so in a divisive manner rather than for the betterment of society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it engages in accusatory and potentially inflammatory rhetoric. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.