Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement discusses the appointment of Reps. Scott Perry and Ronny Jackson to the House Intelligence Committee, which oversees the intelligence community. It also mentions Perry's legal actions against the DOJ following the seizure of his cellphone in connection with the Jan. 6 investigation. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses significant public issues related to government oversight, legal actions, and national security.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is factual and informative. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It simply reports on public figures and their roles. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is neutral and does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more informational in nature.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It sticks to the facts about the appointments and legal actions. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By informing the public about significant appointments and legal actions, the statement uses its influence for the betterment of society by promoting transparency and awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by providing factual information about public figures and their roles. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.