The statement addresses a societal issue related to family structure and perceived hypocrisy among college-educated liberals. It critiques the disparity between personal choices and public opinions on marriage and family stability, suggesting that a stable nuclear family should not be exclusive to the upper class.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm with words and actions, but it does imply a critique of a specific group, which could be seen as divisive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does generalize about a group of people, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on highlighting a perceived hypocrisy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide a constructive dialogue or solutions. It also uses a somewhat accusatory tone, which could be seen as a personal attack on the group in question. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a societal issue, which could be seen as an attempt to use influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express an opinion, but the integrity of the argument could be questioned due to its accusatory tone. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.