Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement criticizes the President and others for actions perceived to undermine the intelligence community, suggesting they owe an apology and should face consequences. The tone is accusatory and demands accountability.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but is accusatory and could contribute to a divisive atmosphere. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on accountability and criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or avoid personal attacks. It calls for a 'reckoning,' which can be seen as a personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for accountability, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by holding leaders responsible. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint, but the tone could be more responsible and constructive.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.