Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement primarily serves as a promotional activity for a podcast episode and a YouTube video featuring Rory McIlroy discussing his changing perspective on the LIV vs. PGA Tour divide. While it touches on a public issue (the LIV vs. PGA Tour divide), the statement itself does not substantively engage in public discourse. It merely directs the audience to other platforms where the actual discussion takes place.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but also does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not involve acknowledging or correcting mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to promote a podcast and a YouTube video, which could be seen as contributing to public discourse indirectly. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.