Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the voting behavior of two Senators on a significant public issue—reproductive rights and access to contraception. It provides an analysis of the political context, specifically mentioning open primaries and Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) as factors influencing the Senators' decisions. The tone is analytical and aims to explain the Senators' actions in a broader political context.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on explaining the Senators' actions based on political mechanisms rather than personal attributes. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the Senators by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing context for the Senators' votes, which can foster empathy and a more nuanced view of their actions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by focusing on the political context rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to inform the public about the political mechanisms that can affect legislative decisions, contributing to a more informed electorate. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing a reasoned analysis. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.