Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 94
6/7/2024, 1:09:32 AM
X
In reply to:
Fred Almeida -- e/acc
@tokyoAGI
·
537d
@GaryMarcus @sd_marlow I doubt a hallucination would lead to your idea of billions in damages? I'm also surprised that at the heart of these arguments that the user has no agency. 🧐
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
@sd_marlow they can be eg in a medical, legal, economic, or political context, depending on the bolt and the hallucination’s distribution.
Steven Marlow
@sd_marlow
·
537d
@GaryMarcus "Hallucinations" in a chatbot are not as destructive as a broken bolt on a plane in flight, but it's still a failure mode!
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
Excuse me for thinking that a lot of people here talking about regulations and CA SB-1047 don’t know the slightest thing about how the actual world works.

Take for example explosives, which are very much a dual-use technology. We don’t say, “go ahead, manufacture whatever the…

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of AI-generated disinformation and its potential impact on elections and conflicts. The tone is serious and cautionary, aiming to highlight the risks associated with AI technology.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by raising awareness about the potential dangers of AI-generated disinformation, which could prevent harm if taken seriously. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by discussing the serious implications of AI-generated disinformation, fostering empathy and compassion for those who might be affected. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a previous comment with a reasoned argument, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the influence of the speaker to highlight a significant societal issue, aiming for the betterment of society by preventing potential harm. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by contributing meaningfully to the discussion on AI and its risks. [+2]