Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 94
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
@DeepAIWriter non-civilians are already using them for mass disinformation campaigns, as weapons. LLMs are not smart enough for military strategy, but they are dumb enough to be exploited to generate mass disinformation.
6/7/2024, 1:37:04 AM
X
In reply to:
David Hinkle
@Drachs1978
·
537d
@GaryMarcus This isn't true. The law bars the release of open source foundation models. Also, I don't understand how you can both think that LLM's are basically nothing burgers and also support regulating them as if they are explosives.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
Excuse me for thinking that a lot of people here talking about regulations and CA SB-1047 don’t know the slightest thing about how the actual world works.

Take for example explosives, which are very much a dual-use technology. We don’t say, “go ahead, manufacture whatever the…

The statement '@Drachs1978 see second sentence here' is a brief reply in an ongoing conversation about the regulation of large language models (LLMs) and their potential uses and risks. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the implications of CA SB-1047 and the dual-use nature of LLMs, which touches on public policy and technology regulation. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement itself is neutral and does not cause harm. It simply directs attention to a specific part of a previous message.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it also does not detract from these values.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a neutral reference to a previous part of the conversation.
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity.