Gary Marcus

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about the regulation of large language models (LLMs) and their potential misuse for disinformation campaigns. This conversation involves public figures discussing the implications of AI technology, which constitutes public discourse as it addresses societal issues and public concerns related to technology and regulation.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a neutral inquiry about the cost and regulation of AI models.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement is neutral and does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. However, it does contribute to the dialogue by seeking clarification.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking a relevant question without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to the discussion in a meaningful way. [+1]