Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 92

The statement critiques the inconsistency of tech companies' positions on AI regulation, suggesting a lack of trustworthiness. It engages with a public issue—AI regulation—and questions the integrity of these companies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language or actions. It is a critique but not an attack. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on companies rather than individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and critical thinking about corporate behavior and regulation. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to question corporate behavior, potentially for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly. [+1]