In reply to:
Saad.
@ThisMyHandle
·
529d
The statement by @marwilliamson constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the Israel-Palestine conflict, and references a political campaign stance. The tone is defensive and aims to correct a perceived misrepresentation of the speaker's position on Gaza.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual correction and a redirection to a policy stance. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a link to a detailed policy stance, which can foster empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the criticism directly and providing evidence to counter it, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement implicitly acknowledges a potential misunderstanding and corrects it by providing a link to the policy stance. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to inform the public about their stance on a significant issue, contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing substantive information. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.