In reply to:
SmokedOut
@okaytheredude
·
529d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
529d
The statement 'Are you under the impression those things were not true when he was president?' constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about the effectiveness of a political figure's past performance and its implications for future elections.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it is somewhat confrontational in tone. It neither significantly upholds nor violates this principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on challenging the other person's viewpoint.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by questioning the other person's impression, but it could be seen as slightly confrontational. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to engage in a political debate. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.