Reposted by Nikki Haley
The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing a significant geopolitical issue, specifically the Israel-Gaza conflict and the U.S. government's stance on it. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that a ceasefire would be detrimental to Israel's security and equating it with defeat. The statement also implies that certain U.S. political figures are not adequately supporting Israel.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong language that could exacerbate tensions and conflict, reducing the score by -2 points. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, particularly by accusing specific political figures of actions that could be seen as harmful, reducing the score by -2 points. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it takes a divisive stance, reducing the score by -2 points. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a confrontational tone and personal attacks, reducing the score by -2 points. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on a significant issue, but it does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible and lacking integrity, reducing the score by -2 points. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.