In reply to:
Moshe
@NeuralNetInvest
·
535d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
535d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about a public issue, specifically the debate over SB-1047, a legislative bill. The context involves a conversation about AI and its potential harms, which is a significant public concern.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a straightforward comment on a poll related to a legislative debate. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a public debate, which can be seen as a form of promoting understanding.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue about a public issue without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.