Gary Marcus

The statement engages in a public discourse by addressing the issue of accountability for potential harms caused by AI technology, a significant societal concern. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, questioning the logic behind the argument that the U.S. should bear the costs of damages caused by AI developed by U.S. companies, especially in the context of international competition with China.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as dismissive.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does raise a critical question about accountability.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by questioning the logic of the previous argument, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as a minor personal attack. [-1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to engage in a significant public issue responsibly. [+1]