Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47

Score 65

@MoonlitMonkey69 @elonmusk but he unfairly singled out Apple for specific criticism and the probability of an effective attack here is likely lower than with many competitors.

ALL LLM-based systems should be eyed with caution. And indeed very little in the cyber world is fully safe.

6/11/2024, 5:42:52 PM

In reply to:

Moonlit Monkey 🐕🙏🪽

@MoonlitMonkey69

530d

@GaryMarcus @elonmusk I think he definately over reacted. It is elegant.

But on the other hand if hackers can potentially find problems would any very large corporation want that near their core business secrets?

So perhaps his concerns aren't meritless either.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

530d

I think @elonmusk owes Apple an apology. I won’t say this is perfect (hackers will inevitably find problems), but it seems to me to be quite thoughtfully conceived, and likely is state of the art.

Max Weinbach

@MaxWinebach

531d

This is from Apple's State of the Union

The local model is a 3B parameter SLM that uses adapters trained for each specific feature. Diffusion model does the same thing, adapter for each style.

Anything running locally or Apple's Secure Cloud is an Apple model, not OpenAI.

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about cybersecurity, corporate responsibility, and the safety of LLM-based systems, which are relevant public issues.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It provides a cautionary note about the safety of LLM-based systems without using inflammatory language. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the need for caution with LLM-based systems and acknowledging the general risks in the cyber world. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by discussing the potential risks of LLM-based systems and does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a meaningful discussion about cybersecurity and corporate responsibility. [+1]