Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 65

The statement in question is a reply within a thread discussing technical issues related to tweets and possibly referencing a broader conversation about technology and social media platforms. However, it does not substantively engage with public issues, policies, or societal concerns. Instead, it appears to be a technical clarification or observation within a specific context.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm with words or actions.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not particularly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it is neutral in tone.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not involve acknowledging or correcting mistakes.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society, but it is neutral in this regard.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity.