Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 65
6/11/2024, 6:22:07 PM
X
In reply to:
Dominick Romano
@dromanocpm
·
530d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk Gary, this is for Apple functionality and is 100% unrelated to Elon’s complaint that an OS Level OpenAI Client that directs data out of the device and to OpenAI shouldn’t even be remotely considered, the fact it will exist is problematic for security. Elon is 100% justified here.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
530d
I think @elonmusk owes Apple an apology. I won’t say this is perfect (hackers will inevitably find problems), but it seems to me to be quite thoughtfully conceived, and likely is state of the art.
Max Weinbach
@MaxWinebach
·
531d
This is from Apple's State of the Union

The local model is a 3B parameter SLM that uses adapters trained for each specific feature. Diffusion model does the same thing, adapter for each style.

Anything running locally or Apple's Secure Cloud is an Apple model, not OpenAI.

The statement 'But is it being remotely considered?' is a part of a public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the security implications of an OS Level OpenAI Client and its consideration by Apple. The tone is inquisitive and seeks clarification on a public issue related to technology and security.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is neutral in tone, adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by seeking clarification, which can lead to a more informed discussion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking a question rather than making a personal attack or ad hominem argument. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to the discussion in a meaningful way. [+1]