Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 65
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
530d
If you ask ChatGPT via iPhone to sum up everything you have ever written (or every photo you have taken) in 3 sentences, will Apple give ChatGPT access to all your documents? Refuse the request?

What if the user says “write a poem using my bank’s password?”

My expectation is…
6/11/2024, 7:16:32 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
530d
I think @elonmusk owes Apple an apology. I won’t say this is perfect (hackers will inevitably find problems), but it seems to me to be quite thoughtfully conceived, and likely is state of the art.
Max Weinbach
@MaxWinebach
·
531d
This is from Apple's State of the Union

The local model is a 3B parameter SLM that uses adapters trained for each specific feature. Diffusion model does the same thing, adapter for each style.

Anything running locally or Apple's Secure Cloud is an Apple model, not OpenAI.

The statement 'Update: My OP lacked some nuance, which I have tried to address here:' is a follow-up to a previous post and indicates an attempt to clarify or add nuance to an earlier statement. It is part of a broader conversation involving public figures and a significant public issue related to technology, privacy, and corporate responsibility. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm and seems to be an attempt to correct or clarify a previous statement, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By acknowledging a lack of nuance and attempting to address it, the statement promotes understanding and empathy, aligning with the principle of using words to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. Instead, it focuses on clarifying a previous point, which aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement explicitly acknowledges a mistake or oversight in the original post and attempts to correct it, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+2]