Marianne Williamson

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 44
6/11/2024, 8:15:25 PM
X
In reply to:
Yojoedad1981
@yojoedad1981
·
527d
@marwilliamson Why don’t you talk about the chemicals in food instead of climate change????
Maybe you’d get real votes if ya did 😏
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
527d
This isn’t just about shellfish, or about Oregon Washington. It’s about the earth. It’s about what we’ve done to it and as a consequence, what we are doing to ourselves.
This will only get worse and we need to get out of our denial. We must see the environmental disaster…

The statement and the image constitute public discourse as they engage in a debate about public health and environmental issues. The image and the comments imply a critique of dietary choices and their impact on health, juxtaposed with a discussion on climate change. The tone of the conversation is dismissive and potentially harmful, particularly towards individuals based on their appearance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and image do harm by promoting body shaming and perpetuating negative stereotypes about body weight and health. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement and image do not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals depicted, engaging in cyberbullying and harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement and image do not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, instead fostering divisiveness and judgment. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement and image do not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead resorting to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]