In reply to:
uOMi
@suenosdeuomi
·
527d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
527d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the qualifications and treatment of political candidates, addressing issues of experience and potential biases in political discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It raises a point about perceived biases without using harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a perceived inconsistency in how political candidates are evaluated. It encourages empathy by suggesting that the speaker's actions were motivated by a lack of action from experienced individuals. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a perceived double standard. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.