Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Rank 12 of 47

Score 132

Additionally, the accusation that my disgust at antisemitism and bigotry must be because I’m getting paid ALSO reeks of antisemitism.

Especially given the absolute mountain of evidence of how I fight AIPAC + other lobbies every day. It’s unsubstantiated, conspiratorial, gross.

6/12/2024, 12:23:55 PM

In reply to:

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

@AOC

160d

It is laughable.

We can mobilize to end the atrocities in Gaza and combat the rise of antisemitism at the same time. Bigotry in organizing spaces imperils everyone’s work.

I work to end the war, protect ALL my constituents, and fight AIPAC. Believe it or not, you can do all 3.

Yair Rosenberg

@Yair_Rosenberg

160d

The idea that @AOC wants or needs AIPAC money is so comically deranged that only people on social media could believe it.

The statement addresses accusations of antisemitism and bigotry, and defends the speaker's stance against such prejudices. It also criticizes the baseless nature of the accusations and highlights the speaker's ongoing efforts against influential lobbies. The tone is defensive and assertive, aiming to clarify the speaker's position and discredit the accusations.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by condemning antisemitism and bigotry, which aligns with the principle of avoiding harm. However, the defensive tone and strong language could potentially escalate tensions. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or hate speech. It focuses on addressing the accusations rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding and empathy by clarifying the speaker's stance against antisemitism and bigotry. However, the defensive tone might limit its effectiveness in fostering compassion.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the accusations and providing evidence of the speaker's actions. It avoids personal attacks and focuses on the issue at hand. [+1]