Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 132
6/12/2024, 12:36:52 PM
X
In reply to:
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
@AOC
·
160d
Additionally, the accusation that my disgust at antisemitism and bigotry must be because I’m getting paid ALSO reeks of antisemitism.

Especially given the absolute mountain of evidence of how I fight AIPAC + other lobbies every day. It’s unsubstantiated, conspiratorial, gross.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
@AOC
·
160d
It is laughable.

We can mobilize to end the atrocities in Gaza and combat the rise of antisemitism at the same time. Bigotry in organizing spaces imperils everyone’s work.

I work to end the war, protect ALL my constituents, and fight AIPAC. Believe it or not, you can do all 3.
Yair Rosenberg
@Yair_Rosenberg
·
160d
The idea that @AOC wants or needs AIPAC money is so comically deranged that only people on social media could believe it.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing significant issues such as military budgets, the Israeli government, and antisemitism. The tone is assertive and defensive, aiming to clarify the speaker's stance on these issues while responding to accusations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by condemning antisemitism and clarifying the speaker's position on military budgets and the Israeli government. However, calling Netanyahu a 'war criminal' could be seen as inflammatory and potentially harmful.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by condemning antisemitism and clarifying the speaker's stance. However, the term 'war criminal' could be seen as a personal attack, which may not fully respect the dignity of the individual mentioned. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by condemning antisemitism and clarifying the speaker's consistent stance on military budgets and the Israeli government. However, the use of strong language like 'war criminal' may detract from the overall message of empathy and understanding.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the issues of military budgets and the Israeli government. However, the term 'war criminal' could be seen as a personal attack, which may not fully align with the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [-1]