The statement 'Yann LeCun @ylecun is too chickenshit to discuss this with me on Twitter but I sure would love to debate on him on this.' is confrontational and uses derogatory language. It appears to be a response to a technical discussion about neurosymbolic AI and gradient-based learning. The tone is aggressive and dismissive, which detracts from constructive dialogue.
- The statement violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions by using derogatory language ('chickenshit'). [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it engages in name-calling and public shaming. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters hostility and division. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism and dialogue. It resorts to personal attacks rather than addressing the substance of the debate. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.