The statement addresses a public issue by discussing the actions of political figures and the perceived inconsistency in legal treatment, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is accusatory and suggests a bias against selective prosecution.
- The statement does not directly harm anyone with words or actions, but the accusatory tone could contribute to divisiveness. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on highlighting perceived injustice. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes an accusatory claim without inviting discussion or providing evidence. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a perceived issue of selective prosecution, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment. However, the accusatory tone detracts from this. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly by making an unsubstantiated claim. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.