In reply to:
Lee Camp [Redacted]
@LeeCamp
·
139d
Jason Call 🇵🇸 Green Party WA02 JillStein2024 CM
@CallForCongress
·
140d
The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in public discourse by discussing the actions of a political party and their implications for democratic processes. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, reflecting frustration and disapproval of the actions described.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses strong disapproval, which can be seen as a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting perceived injustices in the political process. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the political actions described, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to bring attention to a public issue, aiming to influence public opinion and promote democratic principles. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.