Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Jason Call 🇵🇸 Green Party WA02 JillStein2024 CM
@CallForCongress
·
140d
The statement and the conversation it refers to engage in public discourse by discussing the actions of a political party and their implications for democratic processes. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that the actions of the Democratic Party are undemocratic and labeling them as 'fascism.' The statement implies a critique of the fairness and integrity of the democratic process.
- The statement uses strong language ('disgusting display of fascism') which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than fostering constructive dialogue. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individuals or groups involved, as it uses derogatory language ('disgusting display of fascism'). This violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses accusatory and inflammatory language, which can polarize and divide rather than foster mutual understanding. This violates the principle of using words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments ('disgusting display of fascism') rather than addressing the issue in a reasoned and respectful manner. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight an issue related to democratic processes, which can be seen as an attempt to use influence for the betterment of society. However, the manner in which it does so is not responsible or constructive, thus partially aligning with this principle but also undermining it through its tone and language. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.