Gary Marcus

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 55
6/12/2024, 8:44:25 PM
X
In reply to:
grsimari
@grsimari
·
527d
@ylecun @cyberSM7 Are you sure you do grasp the idea? There are so many ways of combining both areas that it's difficult for me to believe that you're capable of considering all of them and discard the possibility. But, who am I, a mere mortal, to question you? @GaryMarcus @pascalhitzler
Yann LeCun
@ylecun
·
530d
@cyberSM7 Very skeptical, to say the least.
You can't make logical reasoning compatible with gradient-based learning because it's discrete and non differentiable.

My proposals for reasoning and planning are based on gradient-based optimization.
SumTrader
@cyberSM7
·
531d
@ylecun What are your thoughts on neurosymbolic AI?
Yann LeCun
@ylecun
·
531d
@AvpElk @headinthebox LLMs are decoder-only transformer architectures trained purely from text or other sequences of discrete tokens to predict the next token (or tokens) in a sequence. They are used to generate token sequences in an auto-regressive fashion.
There are many, many other ways to build…
AVP
@AvpElk
·
531d
@ylecun @headinthebox Curious where you draw the line between “LLM” and “not-LLM”
Yann LeCun
@ylecun
·
531d
@headinthebox You don't seem to understand the difference between product-focused technology development and longer-term research toward the next generation AI systems.
I'm specifically talking about the latter.

At Meta, the former is in the hands of the GenAI organization.
The latter in the…

The statement in question is a reply within a broader conversation about AI and neurosymbolic AI, which are public issues within the field of artificial intelligence. The tone of the statement is confrontational and dismissive, and it includes a personal attack on Yann LeCun by calling his action 'childish.'

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does harm by using dismissive and confrontational language, which can escalate tensions and reduce the quality of discourse. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of Yann LeCun by calling his action 'childish,' which can be seen as a form of harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters a negative and hostile environment. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a personal attack rather than constructive criticism or dialogue, violating the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and avoiding ad hominem arguments. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it resorts to personal attacks rather than substantive engagement. [-2]