Vivek Ramaswamy

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 73

The statement and the conversation it refers to constitute public discourse as they engage with a significant public issue: the role and functioning of the FBI, a major federal law enforcement agency. The tone is assertive and suggests a specific course of action regarding a public institution, which directly addresses societal concerns and policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly incite harm but suggests a drastic action that could have significant implications. It does not explicitly promote harm, so it neither strongly adheres to nor violates this principle.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. However, the comparison to Hitler's SS by @ericmetaxas could be seen as inflammatory and disrespectful, which indirectly affects the overall discourse. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on a specific political stance and action plan. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on a policy proposal rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to propose a significant change in a public institution, which could be seen as an attempt to better society from the speaker's perspective. However, the drastic nature of the proposal and the inflammatory comparison by @ericmetaxas could undermine this intent.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to discuss a public issue. However, the comparison to Hitler's SS could be seen as irresponsible and lacking integrity. [-1]