In reply to:
Laura Haase
@lauralynn1955
·
430d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
430d
The statement '@lauralynn1955 I can appreciate that. But do you feel you have the right to deny other people the freedom to use it?' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the ethical and religious debate surrounding In Vitro Fertilization (IVF). The tone is respectful and seeks to promote dialogue by questioning the right to impose personal beliefs on others.
- The statement strives to do no harm by maintaining a respectful tone and not attacking the other person. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the other person's viewpoint and asking a question to further the discussion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking a question rather than making a personal attack or ad hominem argument. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly using the platform to engage in a meaningful discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.