In reply to:
Camacho2024 🇺🇸 ⛰ 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 🌈
@jcschmieder
·
426d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
426d
The statement by @jcschmieder constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the influence of a powerful lobby and political demographic on public policy, specifically regarding IVF (in vitro fertilization). The tone is informative and aims to clarify the role of the group in question.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual observation about the influence of a lobby group. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it also does not detract from these values.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing additional context to the conversation. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to contribute to the civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.