The statement critiques the current state of AI-generated graphics, comparing it to past issues with AI models like DALL-E. The tone is critical and analytical, aiming to highlight ongoing problems in AI cognition despite improvements in graphics. The inclusion of images serves to illustrate the points made in the text.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm; it is a critique of technology rather than individuals or groups.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by discussing specific issues with AI cognition, which can foster a more informed public dialogue about AI capabilities and limitations. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI technology, focusing on its shortcomings without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By critiquing AI technology, the statement uses its platform to potentially influence improvements in AI development, contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.