Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the legal actions taken by the Democratic Party in Nevada and their implications for democracy. The tone is urgent and accusatory, aiming to mobilize support and awareness for Jill Stein's campaign.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('attack on democracy') which could be seen as inflammatory. This could potentially incite strong emotions or divisive reactions. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It criticizes a political party's actions without targeting individuals in a harmful manner.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and awareness of the issue from Jill Stein's perspective, but it does so in a confrontational manner which may not foster empathy or compassion. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It frames the issue in a way that could be seen as a personal attack on the Democratic Party, rather than fostering a constructive debate. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to mobilize support for a political cause, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for voter choice. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to raise awareness about a perceived injustice, but the confrontational tone may not align with responsible and integrity-driven discourse.