In reply to:
Dr. Freddie
@dr_cuse
·
388d
The statement by @dr_cuse constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to ballot access, democracy, and electoral processes. The tone is assertive and calls for support in a legal battle, indicating a substantive engagement with public concerns.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It focuses on a legal challenge and does not use inflammatory language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting a perceived injustice in the electoral process and calling for support to address it. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the issue of ballot access rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for what the author believes is the betterment of society by fighting for ballot access and democratic principles. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.