In reply to:
Karl “Freight Train” Marx the Seventh, S.J.
@marxseventh
·
417d
The statement engages with a public issue, specifically the democratic process in Michigan and the influence of undecided votes, which makes it a part of public discourse. The tone is critical but not overtly hostile, and the intent appears to be to express dissatisfaction with the process and its perceived manipulation by the Democratic establishment.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the use of the term 'shill' could be seen as pejorative and potentially harmful to those it targets. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It maintains a focus on the issue rather than individuals. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint on a public issue. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.