Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
526d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the future of AI development, specifically focusing on OpenAI's promises and potential outcomes if they fail to deliver on those promises. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses public concerns about technological advancements and corporate accountability.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It raises a legitimate question about the future of AI development and corporate accountability without using harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the actions of a corporation rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the realistic outcomes of technological promises. However, it could be more empathetic and compassionate by acknowledging the challenges involved in AI development.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the feasibility of OpenAI's promises. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by engaging in a meaningful discussion about public concerns related to AI development and corporate accountability. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.