Rashida Tlaib

Rank 2 of 47
|
Score 221

The statement addresses a significant public issue concerning the integrity and functioning of the Supreme Court. It calls for specific actions such as expanding the court, enacting term limits, enforcing a code of ethics, and expediting impeachment proceedings. The statement also names specific justices, suggesting they should be impeached and removed from the bench.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language but makes strong accusations, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. However, it does not appear to incite violence or hatred.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement names specific justices and calls for their impeachment, which could be seen as a violation of their privacy and dignity. However, it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and reform within the judicial system, which can be seen as promoting empathy and compassion for the integrity of the institution. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but focuses on the actions and roles of the justices in question. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to advocate for significant judicial reforms, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing public concerns about the judiciary, though the direct call for impeachment of specific justices could be seen as contentious. [+1]