Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 17

The statement and the accompanying image critique the current state of AI, particularly its ability to follow simple instructions. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and critical, suggesting skepticism about the future capabilities of AI. The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the broader societal issue of AI development and its implications for the future of work, specifically in the field of computer programming.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm anyone but uses sarcasm to critique AI, which can be seen as a form of constructive criticism. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on AI rather than individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a current limitation of AI, though it does so in a critical manner. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI technology, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to discuss the implications of AI on future employment, contributing to societal betterment by fostering dialogue on this important issue. [+1]