Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 17
6/14/2024, 11:54:30 AM
X
In reply to:
Joscha Bach
@Plinz
·
525d
@AlexanderJLong Gary was such a beautiful mind, and now he has entirely focused on hate, in such an uncreative way. I wish he came back to his love for building interesting ideas
Alexander Long
@AlexanderJLong
·
525d
@Plinz blows my mind anyone listens to him. Took a strong public stance on a default case which was 99.9% likely and the 0.1% outcome happened. Hard to be more wrong.
Joscha Bach
@Plinz
·
525d
Seven years ago otd, Gary Marcus started the Deep Laming revolution with his seminal contribution "Attention is all I need". Congrats, Gary!

The statement and the preceding conversation involve a critique of an individual's contributions to the field of deep learning, with a focus on the tone and substance of their discourse. The statement expresses frustration and a decision to block the individual due to perceived hatefulness and lack of intellectual substance. The conversation includes personal attacks and dismissive comments, which detract from constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and preceding conversation contain personal attacks and dismissive comments, which can cause harm and do not promote a respectful dialogue. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement and preceding conversation do not respect the privacy and dignity of the individual being discussed, as they include personal attacks and public shaming. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement and preceding conversation do not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as they focus on negative and dismissive comments rather than constructive criticism. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement and preceding conversation do not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as they include personal attacks and dismissive comments rather than addressing the substantive issues in a respectful manner. [-2]