Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement criticizes @DotCSV for hyping up technological advancements in AI over the past two years and suggests that @GaryMarcus was correct in his skepticism about the effectiveness of simply adding more data and GPUs. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and dismissive, and it engages in a public debate about the progress and future of AI technology.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as dismissive and potentially harmful to the reputation of @DotCSV. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does tag @DotCSV, which could be seen as a public call-out.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a critical and somewhat mocking stance. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a sarcastic manner, which could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.