In reply to:
Alexander Long
@AlexanderJLong
·
525d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a debate about a public figure's contribution to a field, likely in the context of artificial intelligence or machine learning. The tone of the statement is dismissive and somewhat condescending, which can be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it dismisses the other person's intelligence and contributions in a derogatory manner. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in a personal attack. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is dismissive and condescending. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to personal attacks rather than addressing the argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.