Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement criticizes the allocation of funds to the Pentagon and highlights the lack of accountability in military spending while pointing out the underfunding of essential domestic programs like education. The tone is critical and aims to draw attention to fiscal priorities and accountability in government spending.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on critiquing policies rather than individuals, adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the disparity in funding between the Pentagon and domestic programs like education, encouraging readers to consider the impact of these fiscal decisions. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of government spending and calls for accountability without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for better fiscal responsibility and prioritization of domestic programs, aiming for the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to raise awareness about public spending issues. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.