Jill Stien

Rank 24 of 47
|
Score 49

The statement and the linked content constitute public discourse as they engage with substantive public issues, specifically the alleged actions of the Democratic Party against the Green Party and the broader implications for democracy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the language used ('corrupt Democrats') could be seen as inflammatory.Ā [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but calling the Democrats 'corrupt' could be seen as disrespectful.Ā [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and awareness of the issue, but the accusatory tone may hinder empathy and compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks against individuals but does use strong language against a political party, which could be seen as a form of ad hominem argument.Ā [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to bring attention to an issue that the speaker believes is important for the betterment of society.Ā [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to discuss a public issue, but the integrity of the discourse could be questioned due to the accusatory language.Ā [+1]