Jill Stien

Rank 24 of 47
|
Score 49

The statement addresses a highly contentious and sensitive geopolitical issue, specifically the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and critiques U.S. foreign policy. The tone is accusatory and inflammatory, using strong language such as 'genocide,' 'brutal nature,' 'murderous apartheid colonial state,' and 'Genocide Joe.' The intent appears to be to condemn U.S. and Israeli actions and policies, and to call attention to the plight of Palestinians.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses highly charged and inflammatory language, which can contribute to harm by escalating tensions and potentially inciting further conflict. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of individuals, particularly by using derogatory terms like 'Genocide Joe.' This can be seen as a form of harassment or hate speech, violating the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses accusatory and divisive language, which can deepen misunderstandings and hostilities. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, particularly against political figures, which violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    While the statement exercises free speech, it does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, given the inflammatory and accusatory language used. [-1]